Jesus and the Sabbath

Transcript

GR 688
10/28/1984
Jesus and the Sabbath
Matthew 12:1-21
Gil Rugh

Matthew 1 was the turning point in Christ’s ministry as His message turned to one of condemnation and judgment upon the nation for their rejection of Him. Matthew 12 is the turning point in Matthew’s Gospel in that at this point in Christ’s ministry, the leaders of Israel set their minds to bring about His execution. “But the Pharisees went out and conspired against Him, as to how they might destroy Him” (Matt. 12:14). The opposition and resistance to the person and ministry of Christ solidify in Matthew 12.
One of the other gospel accounts tells that the Pharisees joined together with the Herodians in their opposition against Christ. The Herodians were Jews who supported the family of Herod as king over the nation. Herod was not a Jew, he was an Idumean. So in this alliance the leadership of Israel is joining together with their opponents because they have a common unifying task, to bring about the execution of Jesus who calls Himself the Messiah. It is also in Matthew 12 that Jesus confronts the nation with their guilt in committing what we call the unpardonable sin: the rejection of Jesus and the kingdom He has offered them.
Matthew 12 brings together Christ’s three-fold office as prophet, priest and king. Verse 6 says that Christ in His messianic ministry is greater than the temple. This is a reference to His priestly ministry and shows Him to be superior to the priestly ministry which had been carried on in the temple. The last statement of verse 41 refers to “something greater than Jonah.” Jonah is well known as a prophet, so this reference shows the superiority of Christ in His ministry as prophet. And in verse 42, “Something greater than Solomon is here.” Solomon was one of Israel’s greatest kings. This reference to Solomon as King shows the superiority of Christ in His ministry as King.
Now as you might expect the final confrontation between Christ and the leaders of Israel takes place over the observing of religious traditions and practices. When they realize that Jesus Christ will not conform to their religious traditions and their religious practices, then they determine He must be put to death. The issue at hand is the observance of the Sabbath day.
The first incident in Matthew 12 will draw attention to the fact that man is more important than the Sabbath. The Pharisees had put the Sabbath above man. Jesus said man takes precedence above the Sabbath. In a second incident, He will drive home the point that it is all right to do good on the Sabbath. They had the Sabbath superceding even the doing of good. They didn’t understand what was to be accomplished in the observance of the Sabbath. Then Matthew will tie this section together by showing that Jesus is the fulfillment of the great Messianic prophecy in Isaiah 42. This has been one of the major burdens of Matthew’s prophecy to show that Jesus is the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecy and so He is the Messiah of Israel.
To appreciate the discussion of the Sabbath, it is important to realize that the Jews, in almost every area of the Law, had developed minute little regulations to expound on the Law. The Jews weren’t satisfied with what God had said, for example, about working on the Sabbath so they had developed 39 additional regulations governing work on the Sabbath.

How could you know when you were actually doing work on the Sabbath? The leaders of Judaism concluded that if you picked up something weighing more than the equivalent of two figs, you had violated the Sabbath. If the object weighed less than two figs, you would not be working if you picked it up. They had gone to such ridiculous ends with their minute details about the Law that they had made the revelation of God a burden to the people.
A principle is illustrated in this incident of which we should be aware. The further Israel moved from a personal relationship with God and the observance of His Word as He intended it, the more important and precious the observance of their religious traditions and practices became. This principle helps us understand what goes on today in religious activity.
It is my firm conviction that the greatest single weapon Satan has in keeping people from the gospel of Jesus Christ is religion. If you talk to a religious person who does not believe in Jesus Christ, you will find that his religion and his religious practices are barriers which blind him to the gospel of Christ. This is because the observance of his religious traditions and practices is what he depends upon for his relationship with God. Religious people today follow a variety of religious practices anywhere from observing certain sacraments to being baptized to believing that if you do your best, God will accept you as you are. All religious practices and traditions that nullify the Word of God make it more difficult for a person to see the simplicity of the truth of the gospel. Israel had moved away from the truth of the Word of God. They were clinging to their religious traditions and practices.
Many of the great denominations in our country were founded by men who were committed to teaching the truth of the Word of God. What has happened to many of those great denominations? Today they are just a shell holding on to traditions and practices, devoid of the truth of the Word of God. But those people hold on with tenacity to their religious traditions and practices. The further from the Word of God they move, the more important their traditions and practices become. So it was with the Jews’ observance of the Sabbath.
Matthew 12:1-8 describes the incident that provides Jesus the opportunity to show that man is more important than the Sabbath, and that the ministry which God has for man is what matters. “At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath, and His disciples became hungry and began to pick the heads of grain and eat” (Matt. 12:1). As they walked on the paths that went through the fields, the disciples reached out and picked some of the heads of grain, probably wheat or barley because Luke says that they rubbed them in their hands to separate the grain from the chaff. This practice was allowed by the Law according to Deuteronomy 23:25. The Israelites were told that they could not harvest someone else’s crop for themselves, but if they were walking through someone else’s field, they could eat as much as they wanted. This was a guarantee that none in Israel would go hungry, because even if they were hungry and did not have any money, they could walk through someone else’s field and eat grain. In this way God made provision for taking care of the hungry people of the nation.
The disciples were not violating the law by picking the grain. The Pharisees were not accusing them of stealing. The issue centered on the Sabbath Day. “But when the Pharisees saw this, they said to Him, ‘Look, your disciples do what is not lawful to do on a Sabbath’” (Matt. 12:2). The Law did not say it was illegal to do this on the Sabbath, but their regulations interpreting the Law did.
In order to have a better appreciation for the conflict involved, we need to understand how detailed the Pharisees had become in prescribing what the Law meant. Jewish writings of the time tell that the Pharisees had determined that when you picked a head of grain, you were reaping. Therefore, they said the disciples were guilty of reaping crops on the Sabbath. They also said that rubbing the grain in their hands was equivalent to threshing since they were breaking the kernels off the stalk. Furthermore, they indicated that to hold the grain up and blow away the chaff from the kernels of grain, they were winnowing the grain. When it was all said and done, they concluded that the disciples had prepared a meal for themselves while the Law said Jews were not allowed to prepare a meal on the Sabbath. They were instructed to prepare the meal on the day before the Sabbath.
You can see how ridiculous the regulations of the Pharisees had become in describing reaping, threshing and winnowing. All the disciples were doing was having a snack as they walked through the field, but the Pharisees were accusing them of preparing a meal: making their Saturday dinner!
Jesus’ disciples had violated the law of the Pharisees. Jesus does not argue with them about their laws and regulations. Instead, He goes on to a greater principle which encompasses the whole area. This is a good thing to keep in mind when discussing issues with unbelievers. It is easy to get drawn into side issues and end up battling over minute details which do not really matter. Jesus takes them on to the broader issue.
Jesus deals with the Sabbath as it relates to man and attacks them where it will really hurt-on their knowledge of the Scripture. Matthew 12:3 continues, “But He said to them, ‘Have you not read what David did when he became hungry, he and his companions?’” Keep in mind that Jesus is talking to Pharisees. This question to them is direct sarcasm which really cuts them to the heart. In effect, He is saying to them, “You who pride yourselves in knowing so much of the Old Testament, did you ever read what David did? ” Not only had they read it, they probably had memorized it!
Jesus continues His question in verse 4 as He asks them if they had not read “how he entered the house of God, and they ate the consecrated bread, which was not lawful for him to eat nor for those with him, but for the priests alone?” Leviticus 24 tells about the consecrated loaves of bread that were placed in the sanctuary: “Then you shall take fine flour and bake twelve cakes with it; two-tenths of an ephah shall be in each cake. You shall set them in two rows, six to a row, on the pure gold table before the Lord” (vs. 5,6). The twelve loaves of bread, one loaf for each tribe in Israel, symbolized God’s fellowship and communion with the nation.
Leviticus 24:9 continues, “It shall be for Aaron and his sons, and they shall eat it in a holy place; for it is most holy to him from the Lord’s offerings by fire, his portion forever.” At the end of every week they would change the loaves and replace them with fresh ones. The twelve old loaves were reserved as the portion for the priests who alone were allowed to eat them. This was part of God’s provision to sustain the priests. Only Aaron and his descendants were to eat this consecrated bread.
The events Jesus referred to regarding David and his men are recorded in 1 Samuel 21. David is fleeing with his friends from Saul who is determined to kill David. According to 1 Samuel 20:33, Jonathan knew his father had determined to put David to death, so David is fleeing for his life. In 1 Samuel 21:1, David begins his flight, “Then David came to Nob to Ahimelech the priest; and Ahimelech came trembling to meet David and said to him, ‘Why are you alone and no one with you?’” Ahimelech recognizes that David’s coming to him means trouble. So David, the mighty man of God that he was, lied. He told Ahimelech that he was on a secret mission for Saul. He told him, in effect, “I can’t tell you what it is because it is a secret, hush-hush mission. But we are hungry and need to be fed. ”
David continued his conversation with Ahimelech in verses 3 and 4: “‘now therefore, what do you have on hand? Give me five loaves of bread, or whatever can be found.’ The priest answered David and said, ‘There is no ordinary bread on hand, but there is consecrated bread; if only the young men have kept themselves from women.’” The priest informed him that the only bread available was that which was reserved for the priests. But David said that bread would be all right for them. “So the priest gave him consecrated bread; for there was no bread there but the bread of the Presence which was removed from before the Lord, in order to put hot bread in its place when it was taken away” (v. 6).
What is the principle here? The needs of man overrule the observance of a ceremonial regulation. It was more important that David and his men be fed and kept from starvation than that they observe that ceremonial regulation. The needs of man are put in proper perspective in this incident. There is also a parallel between David’s situation and Christ in this event. David is God’s appointed king of the nation who is running for his life. The nation is in rebellion against God. While the appointed king of the nation is running for his life, what value is there in observing the ceremonial regulations when his life needed to be preserved? The needs of David superseded the ceremonial regulation.
The situation Christ finds Himself in is the same. He is God’s appointed King of the nation, yet His life is on the line. Now His disciples are hungry because, even as King of the nation, the nation has not provided for Him as their King. The observance of ceremonial regulations becomes of little or no value in this setting.
Christ is saying in Matthew 12:1-4 that the same principle applies. He is the King of the nation and His followers have a need. Their need supersedes the observing of a ceremonial regulation on this occasion.
Jesus gives them another example. “Or have you not read in the Law, that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple break the Sabbath and are innocent?” (Matt. 12:5). The Jews would be well aware of the fact that on the Sabbath Day the priests broke the Law in doing what God told them to do in the temple. The priests worked harder on the Sabbath Day than they did any other day of the week because Numbers 28 says that on the Sabbath Day the priests had to offer double sacrifices. The Law stipulated that the Jews were not to kill, dress and prepare animals on the Sabbath, yet the priests were required to work twice as hard on the Sabbath as on other days because they had to prepare twice as many animals for the sacrifice.
The temple ministry of the priests and the work of worship associated with the temple superseded all other commandments and regulations. The temple was greater, so the obligations of the temple superseded all other regulations. Even though God had said the Jews could not kill and dress animals on the Sabbath, the work and worship associated with the temple superseded that law so that the priests actually had to double their amount of work on the Sabbath.
The principle being established is that “something greater than the temple is here” (Matt. 12:6). Not only is Christ greater, but His whole messianic ministry is greater than the temple because the temple is a type which looked forward to Christ. Christ, as the fulfillment of the temple, is present in person and is carrying out His messianic ministry which was anticipated by the temple. So Christ in His messianic ministry supersedes and overrules all other regulations and religious traditions because He is greater than the temple. The temple activity superseded all other laws. Yet Christ is greater than the temple, so naturally, He supersedes it all. The real issue is submission and obedience to Christ in His messianic ministry. If work is done in the context of His messianic ministry, it takes priority over any law, regulation or tradition.
This is a great principle, but it is very often misunderstood. The Jews did not understand it. The Messiah and His followers carrying out His messianic ministry were not breaking the Law any more than the priests were breaking it in doing what God required in the temple ritual of worship, because both groups superseded the Law.
People do not understand that today. They nullify Jesus Christ by their religious traditions, practices and observances. They fail to understand that He supersedes them all. By continuing to observe their traditions without realizing that Christ superseded them, they are kept from Him. The message of Jesus Christ is that salvation is found by faith in the finished work of His death and resurrection. That takes precedence over everything and everyone. But how many people have an intense loyalty to their religious traditions and practices yet fail to understand the preeminence and priority of Christ? These Jews didn’t understand it, and many people do not understand it today.
Jesus gives another example that shows they do not understand His authority generally. “But if you had known what this means, „I desire compassion, and not a sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the innocent” (v. 7). Christ tells them again that they do not understand the Scriptures. He does not say that they do not know what the Scriptures say as far as the words go, but He says that they do not know what they mean. Jesus is referring to Hosea 6:6: “For I delight in loyalty rather than sacrifice.” Matthew has already referred to this verse previously in Matthew 9:13, where Christ made the same accusation.
During the days of Hosea, the nation Israel was living in sin and iniquity and rebellion against God. At the same time they were fanatically pursuing the observance of their religious traditions and practices. God intervened saying that
they did not understand reality. He was not looking for sacrifice and religious practices but was instead looking for compassion. The Hebrew word for compassion (chesed) refers to covenant loyalty or faithfulness. God is saying that He is looking for a heart relationship and faithfulness to Him rather than for all of their religious traditions and sacrifices which had become an abomination. God wanted from the people of Israel transformed lives and hearts. That is what Jesus is referring to in Matthew 12. He is telling them that they do not know what it means to have transformed hearts. Keep in mind that He is saying this to the most religious people of His day-those who had devoted themselves and their lives to the study of the Old Testament and to the observance of religious regulations. Jesus is telling them that they do not have the foggiest idea what a real relationship with God is all about, otherwise they would not have condemned the innocent.
Notice that in this statement, “condemned the innocent,” He declares His disciples innocent of the charges made against them. Matthew 12:8 explains why: “For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.” If they are being obedient to Him, how can the Pharisees say they are lawbreakers? The Son of Man, the messianic title given to Christ in Daniel 7:13, is the One who is destined to rule and reign in glory. He is Lord over the Sabbath. This is a clear statement of the deity of Jesus Christ. If His disciples are being obedient to Him, how can the Pharisees say they are breaking the Sabbath when Christ is Lord of the Sabbath? He decides what can be done on the Sabbath and what cannot be done. But now they are accusing the disciples of being lawbreakers. Do you see how twisted the Pharisees are in their thinking? They have everything backwards. The priority of their lives is their religious practices which supersede a relationship with the Messiah of Israel Himself.
The most important thing in life to the Pharisees was the observance of their religious practices and traditions. For many people that has not changed. Some today would give their lives for their religious traditions. The most important thing to them is their church and their religious traditions and practices. They know nothing of a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. They do not understand that He is the sovereign Lord, the Lord of the Sabbath, the One who is over and above all. Man’s relationship to Christ takes precedence over all rules, regulations and traditions. If you have come out of a religious setting of a similar nature, you are aware of the difficulty of changing your priorities. When you came to Christ, all of your traditions and regulations had to fall by the wayside. You had to reorient and restructure your life. The result often is division because people you previously associated with in your traditions and practices become very disturbed and bothered.
Family members are especially upset by such events. Parents raise their children in certain traditions, practices and formalities. When their young person trusts Christ and leaves the traditions behind, the parents’ lives are shattered. They cannot understand what has happened. The loyalty of their lives has not been to Jesus Christ or to the Word of God. It has been to religious observances and traditions. Such people follow the line of the Pharisees. The specifics are different, but the same principle is being carried out.
Matthew records another confrontation by Jesus and the Pharisees regarding the Sabbath in Matthew 12:9-14. This confrontation is related to the principle of doing good on the Sabbath.
“Departing from there, He went into their synagogue. And a man was there whose hand was withered” (v. 9-10). Matthew draws attention to the man with the withered hand. The Pharisees continued with their challenge: “And they questioned Jesus, asking, ‘Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?’-so that they might accuse Him” (v. 10). The Pharisees have totally missed the point. They were no longer questioning whether He had the power to heal on the Sabbath. If He could heal on the Sabbath, that would be a demonstration that He is Lord of the Sabbath. But their only concern was whether or not He would conform Himself to their religious traditions and practices. Thus their question, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?” By asking that question, they are acknowledging that there is no question about the power of Christ or His ability to do the supernatural works of God. Their question is in regard to their religious traditions and practices.
Note the last statement of verse 10, “so that they might accuse Him.” The whole bent of their thinking is their desire to find a reason to accuse Him. They are not open at all to consider what the Scripture says or the fact that His miracles indicate He is really God. Their only concern is how they can accuse Him of breaking their law.
The regulations of the Pharisees said that you could do whatever was necessary to keep a sick person from getting more ill on the Sabbath, but you could not do anything to make his condition better. So if someone was ill, you could do what was necessary to keep him from deteriorating, but you could not do anything to make him get better on the Sabbath. That is a fine line, but that was the way they were drawing their lines in those days.
This man was obviously not dying with a withered hand. He probably wouldn’t get any worse between today and tomorrow. Therefore, according to their law it would be unlawful to make him well.
Jesus responded by giving an analogy: “And He said to them, ‘What man is there among you who has a sheep, and if it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will he not take hold of it and lift it out?’” (v. 11). He is showing how foolish the Pharisees really are. If one of them had a sheep which fell into a pit on the Sabbath, none of them would have waited until the next day to reach down and take the sheep out of the pit. But in so doing, they would have violated their own law for the good of that sheep. This is evidence of how hardened and callused they had become. In their accusation of Jesus, they showed no consideration at all for this suffering man. For a sheep they would do it, but they are ready to murder Christ if He does something kind to this man. Their traditions superseded everything.
That is why there are such fanatics in the world today who are willing to do great and mighty acts of terrorism in the name of their religion. Their principles of religious practice and tradition supersede everything including any concern whatever for another person’s life. We sometimes wonder how people can be like that, but they are just like the Pharisees and religious people of Jesus’ day. They have simply carried that approach to its logical end. Their religious traditions are the important thing, but they couldn’t care less about the person.
By their charges against Christ, the Pharisees are saying that their religious traditions and practices are what matters. This man’s dilemma and suffering are irrelevant to them. In applying the picture of the sheep to the Pharisees, Jesus says in verse 12, “How much more valuable then is a man than a sheep!” These Pharisees would help a sheep on the Sabbath, but they would not help a man. What hypocrites! Jesus continues in verse 12, “So then, it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath.” The principle He is establishing is that the Sabbath never was intended to keep man from doing good. It was given for man’s benefit, therefore, doing good on the Sabbath is right.
Mark records the same event in chapter 3, but he includes a dramatic effect that Matthew does not record. “He said to the man with the withered hand, ‘Get up and come forward!’” (v. 3). They are in the synagogue with all these people sitting around. You can imagine that with Jesus being there the synagogue was packed, since many would have heard about Him. The Pharisees are there, aware that this man with a withered hand attends the synagogue. They challenged Jesus with the question regarding the propriety of healing on the Sabbath. After having told them something of the value of a man, so that everyone can hear, Jesus says to the man with the withered hand, “Get up and come forward!” Can you imagine what it would have been like in that synagogue with every eye riveted on that man as he got up and came and stood before Jesus? Christ did not want any misunderstanding of exactly what was going to take place. He wanted to make it clear that if they could rescue a sheep on the Sabbath, then He could rescue a man who is of infinitely more value than a sheep.
Matthew 12:13 continues: “Then He said to the man, ‘Stretch out your hand!’ He stretched it out, and it was restored to normal, like the other.” All Christ does is give a command, “Stretch out your hand!” In so doing, the Pharisees said He violated the Sabbath because He made the man well. Wouldn’t you think they would be overwhelmed with someone who had the power to do such a mighty deed? Just stop and think about it. By a spoken word Jesus had the power to restore that man’s withered, shriveled hand to normal in an instant of time! But these religious leaders missed the point completely.
Matthew records the results in verse 14: “But the Pharisees went out and conspired against Him, as to how they might destroy Him.” When you read that, you can hardly believe how hardened those people are in their sin. Mark’s account tells that when Jesus looked around the synagogue in response to the Pharisees’ challenge, He was angry at their hardness of heart. Those people were so blind to the truth, just like people are today. If you sit down with an
unbelieving pastor or religious leader and share with him the glorious truth of God and how it has transformed your life and made you a new person, he probably will not understand it at all. He might tell you that it is good if it worked for you, but he would totally miss the point. He would be just like the religious leaders of Jesus’ day.
From this point on, the course is set. The leaders of Israel have determined that the only thing that will put a stop to the ministry of Christ is His death. Now it is a matter of laying the plans and determining how and when they can best accomplish their goal.
Matthew concludes this section by showing that what Christ is doing actually fulfills Old Testament prophecy. “But Jesus, aware of this, withdrew from there. Many followed Him, and He healed them all” (Matt. 12:15). Jesus withdrew from the area to avoid precipitating a crisis. It is not time for His execution, and the multitudes might be whipped up to defend Him. So He withdrew from the area, but He did not stop His ministry. The fact that He healed them all shows that He is not intimidated from doing what He had come to do. But verse 16 says He “warned them not to tell who He was,” and He did this in order to fulfill the great Messianic prophecy of Isaiah 42.
Matthew quotes Isaiah 42:1-4: “Behold, My Servant whom I have chosen; My Beloved in whom My soul is well-pleased; I will put My Spirit upon Him” (Matt 12:18). God the Father is speaking in this verse which joins God the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Jesus Christ is the Servant of God. He is the chosen one of God. He is the One with whom God is well-pleased. He is the One upon whom the Spirit of God has descended and He is the One to whom the religious leaders of Israel are focusing their opposition, determined to execute Him because He is out of step with their religious practices and tradition. You see how totally twisted and turned around we become. It’s just the opposite of reality. In the name of their religious beliefs, they are planning the execution of the One who is called the Servant of God, the Chosen of God, the Well-Beloved of God, the One who is empowered by the Spirit of God. But conformity to their religious tradition demands that He be executed. Could they be any more removed from God and His truth than they are? You see the great barrier that religion becomes to the truth of God.
Verse 18 continues, “He shall proclaim justice to the Gentiles.” There is a change taking place and the ministry concerning Christ will become directed to the Gentiles because of His rejection by the nation Israel. “He will not quarrel, nor cry out; nor will anyone hear His voice in the streets” (v. 19). He is fulfilling this prophecy by withdrawing from the opposition of the Pharisees. He is not going to quarrel or do battle. He is not going to send them to go and holler in the streets and whip up the people to support Him.
“A battered reed He will not break off, and a smoldering wick He will not put out, until He leads justice to victory” (Matt. 12:20). How does Jesus deal with the struggling, the afflicted, the suffering in Israel, or with the man with the withered hand? In mercy and grace He reaches out and restores them and strengthens them; He deals with them in mercy and in grace. He does not come and snuff out the struggling, the weak and the battered.
Until He comes in triumph, leading in judgment to set up His kingdom. “And in His Name the Gentiles will hope” (Matt. 12:21). We ought to be glad for this section because you and I are here today, by and large, are Gentiles. We have hope in the Messiah because of the grace of God. This One that was sent to and rejected by the nation Israel is the One who has become the hope of the Gentiles. We have hope of life. Why? Because the truth of Christ is presented to us by the mercy of God. The nation of Israel said, “No, we will not have Him to be King. We have one King and this is not the manGod has set aside that nation for a time and offers hope to the Gentiles if they will but believe in Him as the Messiah of Israel, the Savior of the World.
I wonder where you are in relationship to Jesus Christ. It is easy to look and see how blind and foolish and spiritually stupid these religious leaders were. But where are we today? We are in the same situation because we have the light of the revelation of the Word of God clearly laying out that salvation is a matter of personal faith in the finished work of the Son of God who died on a cross to pay the penalty for sin and who was raised from the dead because the penalty had been paid. There is no hope for salvation for anyone in any other way except believing in Him as the Savior who died to pay the penalty for your sin. But multitudes of people today are going through a religious activity, religious practices observing religious traditions. Why? They think they are obeying God and being faithful to Him. What they are really doing is nullifying the Word of God. They are choosing their tradition over the revelation of God, doing the
same thing the Pharisees did.
Do you have a personal relationship with Him? Have you come to recognize and believe that He died for you personally to pay the penalty for your sins individually? Do you trust Him alone as your Savior or have your religious traditions and practices blurred your vision?
Those of us who believe the Bible and are committed to Jesus Christ can allow these religious procedures to become very precious to us. The more we do that, the more our focus becomes twisted and turned towards our practices and away from the Word of God. If you do that over a period of time, pretty soon the Word of God is left out and all that is left is the empty, void traditions and practices of men, of churches, of those who do not understand the truth of the Word of God. Praise God that in Him is salvation, not only for the Jews but hope for the Gentiles as well.